杰克逊医生或因过失杀人罪遭起诉（双语）

屈联西

2010年09月17日     国际在线
　　Unsurprisingly, Dr. Conrad Murray would prefer not to be held responsible for Michael Jackson's death。

　　The beleaguered physician's attorney filed a motion to dismiss Joe Jackson's wrongful death lawsuit, calling it "at best a press-release that is intended to prejudice and inflame the jury pool and the public."

　　一直处于风口浪尖的杰克逊私人医生康拉德-穆雷很可能因过失杀人罪遭到起诉，而这位医生的律师向法院提出动议，回绝迈克尔的父亲乔-杰克逊的起诉，并称之为“在误导公众和陪审团”。

　　Murray is facing an involuntary manslaughter charge for administering the potent anesthetic that ultimately caused Jackson's death on June 25, 2009.

　　But the possible prejudicial nature of Joe's suit isn't the only reason Murray has for wanting it tossed。

　　According to the motion filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, the suit should be dismissed because Joe Jackson is not a legal beneficiary of his son's estate and Katherine Jackson, who is, "wants nothing to do with this case."

　　Indeed, the 81-year-old family patriarch was not named in the King of Pop's will, and he ended his bid for a monthly stipend from the estate earlier this year。

　　In response to Murray's accusations, Joe's attorney, Brian Oxman, said that the wrongful death suit reads just fine。

　　"It sets out facts," Oxman told the AP. "It doesn't set out anything other than the day-by-day, moment-by-moment description of what happened."

　　穆雷面临因大剂量使用烈性麻醉剂导致杰克逊死亡的过失杀人罪，而乔所提出指控的偏颇并不是穆雷希望这项起诉被回绝的唯一原因。

　　根据礼拜三所提出的回绝动议中指出，乔-杰克逊并非遗产合法受益人，而有用此项权利的杰克逊之母——凯瑟琳“并不希望涉及这个案件。”在杰克逊的遗嘱中并未提及八十一岁的乔，而他每月固定从遗产中获得的月钱也在今年早些时候被停止。

　　Speaking of those alleged facts, Murray's motion to dismiss also questions why Joe didn't name Jackson's longtime plastic surgeon, Dr. Andrew Klein, as a defendant, when his suit clearly states: "Dr. Klein may have been medicating Michael Jackson up until or even beyond June 18, 2009, less than one week before Michael Jackson's death."

　　"AEG Live, LLC read Michael Jackson the proverbial 'riot act' to get him to stop subjecting himself to overmedication by Dr. Arnold Klein," stated Joe's complaint, per Murray's motion。

　　"The plaintiff [Joe Jackson] does not explain why, given these allegations, Dr. Arnold Klein is not a required party to be added to accord proper relief," reads today's filing。

　　A hearing on Murray's motion has been set for Oct. 18.

　　对于此，乔的律师回应，过失杀人罪名的指控并无偏颇。在穆雷的动议的动议中，对于乔不没有将杰克逊长期整形医生安德鲁-克莱因列为被告的做法提出了质疑。穆雷指出，知道去年六月十八日为止，安德鲁都可能一直在为迈克尔开局药品。